Elizabeth Campbell Attorney General office /Arizona BAR

Given their capacity for harm, when prosecutors act unethically, state bar organizations should take seriously their duty to protect the public. They should rigorously investigate credible claims of misconduct and impose meaningful penalties on errant prosecutors, using the power we confer upon them for precisely that purpose.

State bars must be for the people. And the people who place faith in the criminal system—the accused, the victims, and the rest of us—deserve better than we’re getting from our prosecutors and from our state bars.

nursing in arizona

The pay gap in nursing still exists: studies show that male nurses make more than female nurses despite nursing being 91% female. Initial pay differences of $5,000 at the beginning of a nurse’s career doesn’t sound like a big deal, but over 20-30 years it can add up to $150,000 difference.

From study: The salary gap was $7678 (95% CI, $5319-$10 037; P < .001) for ambulatory care and $3873 (95% CI, $3144-$4601; P < .001) for hospital settings. The gap was present in all specialties except orthopedics, ranging from $3792 (95% CI, $802-$6781; P < .001) for chronic care to $6034 (95% CI, $4175-$7893; P < .001) for cardiology. Salary differences also existed by position, ranging from $3956 (95% CI, $2174-$5737; P < .001) for middle management to $17 290 (95% CI, $11 690-$22 891; P < .001) for nurse anesthetists (Figure 2). The model accounted for half of the variance in salaries (R2 = 0.46).”

This isn’t to bash male nurses- I’m interested in discussing the factors that play into this: is it gender discrimination, is it that men negotiate better/more comfortably, or is it motherhood and child rearing factors- leaving healthcare to have children and then returning?

AZBN justifies their actions

So here is my unofficial opinion on this process. If you are a normal caring kind of person it feels bad to beat up on you. Like kicking puppies. Remember these people are not normal, nothing caring about them . to get their co workers / board members involved , and to make it ok they have to villianize you to make it ok. Nobody beats up a nice person. Everyone seems to be ok with beating up a mean person. This is a protective mechanism that I have seen for years. They have to label you, be it disruptive. Unsafe. Aggressive. Bully. Once they get their label it is do much easier. You are a danger. You are disruptive….. then they get buy in from the board members. Imagine if they told the truth. We have a really nice and competent nurse who takes care of her patients in the community who is providing better and safer care than our peers. Would they be so willing ? Would they say , hey what your doing is not right and encourage others to stop as well , or does the almight dollar rule their conscience. ? They must label and dehumanize to be able to go to battle. Been there and experienced that way too many times. Remember, they can’t touch your soul!!


Diane Milhaskey alj ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT . 10/29/18
Recap events. Respondent pro per asked for one extension , denied,
unheard of a judge not allowing ONE extension but the AAg Elizabeth
Campbell did not agree to it so the alj is siding with the state all the way ,
whatever fits her schedule.
Witness list was not provided by AAG Campbell. FAILED to file witness list.
Campbell brought in AZ GAMING DEPARTMENT employee to represent
the AZ BOARD OF NURSING. ALJ Milhaskey . refused to allow
respondent to ask ‘witness investigator “ to ask her questions concerning
her ‘employment ‘ with the BON. one question AAG did not object just
interrupted, to about “gaming employee “ employment with the BON .The
respondent stated his objection about her being BON employee, and ALJ
reprimanded the respondent for 10 mins . The Milhaskey stated “i don’t
want to reprimand “ with that witness said “you already did “. (is that on
the transcript ? lots of changes after the court hearing. At all times
showing partiality to AAG Campbell. Even the tone of her voice changed
when addressing individuals. From sickening sweet soft tone to louder
harsher “stop your argument “ message tone. (no arguments in this
courtroom just plead beg, and cow down is acceptable.
Again the Bon is using ‘security “ “police officers “ at taxpayers expense to
sit in a trial , for intimidation purposes . There are security (2) at the door
and camera is rolling, but they brought in officers, who sat and texted the
entire time. A common “trick ‘ of this BON. To make respondents look
“dangerous”, with a hidden message to the judge. The “sham court “
started at 903 am the officer did not arrive until 908 am so the participants
felt ‘safe “ in a room at the end of the hall , closed door , with no one else
around , for 5 mins but not the rest of the time. A JOKE !
Although the opinion was already in before the trial started. Milhaskey was
not even a good actress . A long winded speech of rebuttal questions by
Milhaskey stating “a GOOD lawyer , asks maybe one or two questions of
the witness “ What planet is the ALJ from ? subtle little remarks , that
confirmed anyones doubt about this ALJ being a complete idiot and biased.
The state was allowed to bring up everything from abortions to obituaries ,
from 1969 , but the respondent was not allowed to get in one question
about the credibility of this az gaming dept ‘witness” . (what are they hiding
? ) When Gaming Witness took the stand she said “she works for the state
of az and ‘was assigned to this case “ the Judge with that gave her a very
odd look. After lunch when the respondent started to ask questions about
this, he was stopped in his tracks by AAG and ALJ. It appears that the
ALJ asked about this “witness ‘ real story during the lunch break. What was
really going on, although she will deny it.
It also appears that AAG prepped her ‘witness “ who jumped out of the
witness chair , with ‘relief” , when the ALJ got her out of answering any
questions, after appearing very nervous. But answered questions with “to
the best of my recollection “ really who needs a psych eval here? She
cannot remember ? This investigation started in JAN ! not even a year
ago! Then multiple “I BELIEVE SO “ . OF course respondent did not know
to say I need a YES OR NO , can this witness be fraudulently
charged? Of course she swore in respondent, who had to remind the
“experienced “ ALJ she forget to say “in God we trust “ and had to prompt
her. Pretty sad. At one point ALJ said ‘you can complaint to my boss”
really like your boss isn’t part of the problem? (Greg Hanchett) Then
when reprimanding and not show any leeway to non attorney, ALJ made
another inappropriate statement. “I want this case over TODAY.” Really,
putting a time limit on the respondent, after allowing the state all morning ?
Bad actor, how about something like “I’d want due process and justice to
be served, and although we can go as long as it takes I will not allow for
repeating one’s self. “ AAG Campbell mentioned that the Dr who was fired
from WARMC, was black and that was the one in the fictional book written
by Respondent was “negroid” , Campbell mentioned SIX TIMES on the
record, a ‘fictional character was attending Howard University.” Campbell
repeated herself on every count more than once, and a number of times,
exaggerated many times including , intimidation and ‘pattern ‘ of behavior
(over a 52 year period of time , same incident 2-3 times) . While Campbell
and the BON have a steady ‘pattern of corruption behavior” . Linda Monas,


More than one person suggested , making myself scarce, that they have been known to kill people who expose them . Cause great harm . This is true I know. It has happened. To go into hiding, to never post the truth, to never file anything in court. They are known for retaliation methods and doing what ever they can to get a person to stop. That kind of fear is for the gutless, the obedient, another member who has been trained since birth to keep quiet , never speak up, never question. This is posted so you when the question comes up “who done it “. To many are aware and will make it known. It has already been reported, and well documented, even future predictions, which have already come true. Just so you know.


I remember at my hearing basically the same “cast”. Afterwards they said I was too anxious and implied that harmed my ability to treat patients. Working as a NP . The board holds the ‘anxiety meter” .

Too anxious? It’s their group against me. They hold all the power. They make all the rules. There is no due process. My livelihood is on the line. Continuing to treat patients who depend on me is on the line. My education and all I’ve invested for the past 8 years is perhaps going to be wiped out, leaving only huge student loans in place. And I’m TOO ANXIOUS? This is one account of how they make up strange comments . Another one , they accused the NP of “fighting his case too vigorously ” . Strange comments ! That is the reason the state board of nursing and their partner’s in crime admin law court, cannot be regulated and should never be trusted to do the right thing without being watched over 100% of the time. Not just having supervision in the same building but watching over their shoulder !